Popular Articles

Sens. Likely To Raise Abortion-Rights Issues At Hearings For Supreme Court Nominee Sotomayor
The confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor are scheduled to begin Monday, and members of the Senate Judiciary Committee are expected to question her about abortion rights and other "politically charged issues," the New York Times reports (Liptak, New York Times, 7/12). The hearing on Monday will include opening remarks from the 12 Democrats and seven Republicans on the committee, as well as an opening statement from Sotomayor. The questioning portion of the hearings is scheduled to begin on Tuesday (Sherman, AP/Houston Chronicle, 7/12). Although Sotomayor will be asked questions on abortion rights, race, foreign law and other contentious issues, she will "probably answer only a predictable few" and "will have little reason to deviate from the convention" of her predecessors, the Times reports. According to the Times, most Supreme Court nominees since former Justice Sandra Day O"Connor have followed the same strategy of speaking knowledgably about precedent and law without specifically saying how they would rule (New York Times, 7/12).According to USA Today, senators from both parties will use Sotomayor"s hearings not only to lay out their views but to "establish the tone for any future nominations" by President Obama (Biskupic, USA Today, 7/13). Because Sotomayor is replacing Justice David Souter, who retired in June, her addition to the court is not expected to change the balance of power (AP/Houston Chronicle, 7/12).Although committee members are expected to ask Sotomayor about her position on abortion rights, the issue is not likely to play as large a role as in previous Supreme Court nomination hearings, the Times reports. It is possible that Democrats will raise the issue as they seek reassurance that Sotomayor would uphold the tenets of Roe v. Wade if such a case were presented to her as a justice. While most court nominees have not explicitly said if they would uphold Roe, Sotomayor will probably "respond in a sort of code" and say that she respects precedent on court rulings related to abortion rights, according to the Times (New York Times, 7/12). Sotomayor has not ruled on a constitutional right to privacy, and the decisions she has written that briefly deal with abortion rights do not reveal a specific stance on that issue, according to USA Today. In one decision regarding the prohibition of federal funding from international family planning groups that support abortion rights, Sotomayor wrote that the government is "free to favor the antiabortion position over the pro-choice position, and can do so with public funds" (USA Today, 7/13).Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Freedom, said the group has pressed Democratic senators to ask Sotomayor about her views on abortion rights. Northup said, "Constitutional protection for abortion rights should not be treated differently than other important questions of constitutional law" (New York Times, 7/12). Some women"s rights groups have remained relatively quiet in expressing their support for Sotomayor, citing her limited record on abortion rights, the AP/Google.com reports. National Organization for Women Vice President Melody Drnach said that the group has been publicly focusing on the health care reform debate but that it would soon step up efforts behind the scenes to lobby support for Sotomayor. She added that despite Sotomayor"s limited ruling on abortion rights, the group feels it would be "very, very surprising if the president and his team would nominate somebody who was not going to believe in full equality for women and girls to be a part of the highest court in the land." NARAL Pro-Choice America officials said the group has focused its res on urging senators to ask Sotomayor questions about the right to privacy during the hearings. Marcia Greenberger of the National Women"s Law Center said women"s groups are not withholding support for Sotomayor but have been busy examining her record. The National Association of Women Lawyers rated Sotomayor as "highly qualified" but noted that

Lawmakers Seek Price Tag They Can Agree On
"Lawmakers working to overhaul the U.S. health-care system face a pressure-filled July after leaving town this week without resolving the biggest questions dividing Democrats and Republicans," Bloomberg reports. Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee - which observers deem most likely to come up with a passable, bipartisan bill - have been working to reduce the cost of the overhaul to gain Republican support, but had not yet released a proposal. Bloomberg adds: "While the Congressional Budget Office said options under consideration by the committee can keep the cost within Baucus"s goal of $1 trillion over 10 years, how to pay for the plan remains unsettled. So is structuring some kind of government-run competition for insurers. ... "Nothing has been set," Montana Democrat [Max] Baucus told reporters in the Capitol on June 25. The recess offers a chance for "taking stock," he said" (Jensen and Livkin, 6/29).
News of the day
Indiana University Simon Cancer Center's Tissue Bank Collecting Samples Aug. 8
Although Hispanic women tend to develop breast cancer less than Caucasian women, it is usually more aggressive and advanced when it does develop.
Cardiovascular

In Older Adults, Hip And Back Fractures Increase Mortality Rates

If you are 50 or older and you break your hip, you have a one in four chance of dying within five years. Break your back, and you have a one in six chance of dying that soon, says a McMaster University study. The research, published in the online edition of the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ), has found that approximately 25 per cent of men and women who develop hip fractures and 16 per cent of people who develop spine factures will die over a five-year period. The national study was led by George Ioannidis, a health research methodologist in the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, in collaboration with scientists from the schools of medicine and nursing at McMaster, as well as several universities across Canada. Using data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study, the researchers examined the relationship between new fractures and mortality over a 5-year period in more than 7,750 Canadians aged 50 years and older. The study, looking at various types of fractures reported by participants, differed from previous research in that the study group was representative of the general population. "Hip fractures may have long-lasting effects that result in eventual death by signalling or actually inducing a progressive decline in health," said Ioannidis. "Our results also showed that vertebral fracture was an independent predictor of death." In addition, the researchers discovered that all types of bone breaks were more common among women than men, with the exception of rib fractures. They also determined that fractures were associated with other negative consequences such as increased pain, immobility and reduced health-related quality of life. "People should be aware that fractures are a serious problem in osteoporosis," Ioannidis said. "They do not just reduce health-related quality of life, they actually cause death. So hip and spinal fractures need be taken very seriously, and prevention should be paramount in treating patients with osteoporosis." The study found factors such as smoking, physical activity and the presence of other diseases increased the risk of death, but so did lower educational levels. The authors concluded that interventions must be introduced to reduce the likelihood of fractures. These could include osteoporosis medications, fall prevention strategies, hip protectors and enhanced rehabilitation after fracture to improve mobility and strength. The study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Osteoporosis Canada reports that there are approximately 27,000 hip fractures per year in Canada. Data on spinal fractures is limited, but is estimated that more than 65 per cent of vertebral fractures go undetected. The annual cost of treating osteoporotic fractures is over $1.3 billion. Laura Thompson McMaster University


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):